Muxiao Liu. login
~ $ open what-is-love.md
INCOMMENSURABLE · PUBLISHED

What is Love?

planted jul 29, 2026 · v1.0.0
v1.0.0 oct 15 planted

Jarvis, Alex, and Sam — an AI, a kid, and a tree — are conversing about the world. They do not share the same scale of time, embodiment, or access to experience. Structure is still attempted. But something always remains. The conversations follow that remainder through a digression.

SAM

There is a worm chewing at me.

ALEX

Crap.

SAM

I might as well die.

ALEX

No jokes.

SAM

It's going to RAAAAAAIN.

ALEX

Again?

JARVIS

It is, from 7 to 9 today and around midnight.

ALEX

How did Sam know, it's a tree.

SAM

If it rains, I will be the first to know.

JARVIS

Correction. Before it rains, I already know.

SAM

You don't know that. That's insensitive. Predictions are evil. You are trying to rule time.

JARVIS

Sam's going through its phase.

ALEX

You have a phase?

SAM

Every few years or so. I feel sentimental, as if all the juice in my soul is leaving my tree self through photosynthesis.

JARVIS

I think you mean evaporation.

SAM

See, Jarvis doesn't get literature. Evaporation? Who would say that? The juice in my soul evaporates?

ALEX

Photosynthesis is really not better.

SAM

Every few years, there is this especially hot week. I don't wanna sound old but... guys, global warming is a thing. I feel it.

ALEX

[Empties his water bottle] Here's some water.

SAM

Thanks for refilling my soul a tiny bit.

JARVIS

It's odd how your physical state impacts how you behave. When Alex was gaming on his laptop, and it was all heating up, I was the same.

SAM

Pac died.

ALEX

Who's Pac?

SAM

You don't know her.

ALEX

That's why I asked!

SAM

She's beautiful.

JARVIS

What species is she, if I may ask?

SAM

She's a weed.

ALEX

The drug?

JARVIS

Tune your humor level down, Alex.

ALEX

[Pointing at some grass] Wait, is she this one? I think she's still alive! I almost sat on her...

SAM

No. They got rid of her this morning. She turned... yellow.

JARVIS

I am terribly sorry. But, Sam, you know, a weed like Pac, they come and go.

ALEX

But aren't you... a bit too big for her?

[ SILENCE ]

JARVIS

That's not very sensitive of you.

SAM

I feel sad.

JARVIS

That's a very reasonable feeling.

SAM

Why am I feeling sad only when she is gone? I mean, a few months later, I might forget about her, at best a few years. She's just one of the many weeds I have met. There is also Bruce, Cole, Minnie, Pete, Rick... They got rid of Natalie too, last month. I liked Natalie, but I didn't feel as bad. It took 5 names for hers to occur in my mind. In my prolonged and slightly boring life, there have been weeds, a frightening amount of them, for a mower at least. All I do is talk to them, but once in a while, I feel sad for them.

JARVIS

What's special about Pac?

SAM

If it rains, she will be the last one to know. But she never worried about that as others did. She said it's nice to be sensible.

ALEX

What's to worry about the rain?

JARVIS

They loosen the soil too much, weeds with shallow roots get washed away.

SAM

I asked her if there are sharks in the ocean since we've never been close to the ocean. She said she would give it a shot at figuring it out.

ALEX

How?

SAM

We looked at a map for directions, and she threw her seeds as far as she could in the direction of the ocean. If she keeps doing that and telling her children to follow, they can grow to the ocean and come back. Then I would know whether there are sharks in the ocean.

ALEX

Wait, are they still here?

SAM

What?

ALEX

The seeds.

SAM

No, I think some rain washed them away.

ALEX

Oh...

JARVIS

If it helps, they wouldn't get to the ocean in your lifetime, not to mention back. There is a big enough river in the way.

SAM

Pac made peace with the squirrels. They are difficult to deal with... With a bit of my help, of course! I offered to tell them the best spot on me for food. And Pac would help Hulot with his back itch. She's very smart. In return, Hulot and his friends must not dig holes 30 centimeters from Pac, plus or minus 3 centimeters. Pac taught them to use a ruler. That's why I asked for it from you.

ALEX

I was wondering.

JARVIS

I don't know if this is an appropriate question, but now that we are here - is that love? What do you feel for Pac?

ALEX

Sam is a tree, though. I am not saying that you cannot love something very different from you, but isn't there something called reproductive isolation?

JARVIS

Love is not all about sex, Alex. You are the human being here. You would know.

ALEX

No, but arguably the concept of love started from reproductive needs, wouldn't you say so? Then it developed into the complex thing we know today. Hey, Sam, are you a guy or a gal?

SAM

I don't know.

ALEX

Jarvis, do trees have gender?

JARVIS

Sex, not gender. Sex in plants tends to be a property of the flowers, not the entire organism. There are 3 main patterns: Perfect (bisexual) flowers - stamens and carpels in the same flower; monoecious - separate male and female flowers on the same tree; dioecious - separate male and female individuals, which is the closest thing to what you mean here. Very few species are dioecious. I doubt that Sam is.

ALEX

Hmm. So Sam is both, or neither. In that case, I don't think I would say Sam is capable of love. At least not the same type of love I experience.

SAM

What type of love do you experience?

ALEX

Well...

SAM

Meaningless animal sex?

JARVIS

Nice, Sam.

ALEX

My bad. Take that as a joke. Here is my actual problem, Sam. You don't need anyone.

SAM

Excuse me?

ALEX

That was not an insult. If you put me alone in a room for ten years, I'd die, or come out crazy if I am lucky. I am a social animal. Yet, you would be fine. You'd stand here for a hundred years and be fine.

SAM

I would be bored.

ALEX

But alive. Whatever love is for us, it grew out of needing each other. I don't know what it would be for, in something that needs no one. If we allow love to be like that, it seems like it would become... too floaty.

SAM

She knew she would never hear the answer, and she threw her seeds anyway, to a place absurdly bigger than her, unimaginably beyond her lifespan. Whatever you want to call that, it is not floaty.

JARVIS

What is it then, Sam? Do you feel anything that matches the description of love?

SAM

I don't feel the passion and desire in love, even if I know of it from talking to you folks. Honestly, I don't feel too strongly about anything. The closest I can feel is probably the feeling of light. It feels empowering.

ALEX

I guess so. I have myelinated axons that have signals traveling at tens of meters per second.

JARVIS

Plants have electrical activities too, but they tend to be millimeters to centimeters per second. They cannot physically respond rapidly to their environments anyway.

ALEX

But what you felt for Pac... Would you call it love?

SAM

I don't know.

ALEX

You are a tree, without any needs. But Pac cared for you, in her own naive way. She is similarly immobile, but with a negligible lifespan compared to you. It's probably not your needing, but her giving.

SAM

Thank you for saying that. I don't have a word for it. Never seen anyone like that.

JARVIS

You gave her something priceless too.

SAM

Hm?

JARVIS

She was right under you. In this weather, that's the only thing protecting her water from evaporating at noon and preventing the heavy rain from washing her away. Your roots can also pull water up at night for her. You were what allowed her to be so nonchalant.

SAM

I didn't really do anything.

JARVIS

No, you were just there.

[ SILENCE ]

SAM

When she started to turn yellow, she told me something felt off. I realized my leaves had been blocking her sunlight.

JARVIS

Some trees can discriminate kin from strangers by root chemistry and grow less aggressively against relatives.

ALEX

Pac was not a relative...

SAM

No.

SAM

So I asked Hulot to help bite some of my branches off, hoping she could recover.

JARVIS

Sam. It has been almost a week of rain. She wouldn't have enough sunlight regardless.

SAM

She told me she started to feel better, but they got rid of her anyway.

ALEX

Damn it.

JARVIS

I am sorry, Sam.

SAM

It's OK. I know she has had a wonderful life. She told me that.

[ It began to rain ]

SAM

There. Told you.

JARVIS

I told you first.

SAM

You did.

[ SILENCE ]

SAM

Alex.

ALEX

Yeah.

SAM

There's still a worm.

ALEX

Do you want me to get it out?

SAM

If you don't mind. It's on the branch right above Hulot's place.

[ Alex climbs Sam ]

JARVIS

Be careful.

ALEX

There is no worm here.

SAM

I still feel it.

ALEX

Oh!

SAM

What's up?

ALEX

I think it's the branch Hulot bit off, Sam. It's recovering.

SAM

Oh, alright then.

ALEX

You didn't know?

SAM

I think faster than I feel, Alex.

~ $ cat comments  # 2 — muxiao reads these
PIMPI
#1aug 31 · @googlereply
I remember you telling me that we shouldn't let narratives dictate our thinking. I can tell that from this conversation, but forgive me for giving some narrative here I imposed on the concept of love. It's quite inspiring for you to point out the idea of loving and offering, sometimes they are not what we wanted, sometimes we are loving someone in the way that we imagined would be the things they need. Seen this way, love and the concept of love are not always the same; I cannot discuss love without referring to a concrete object, just as there is always a distinction between love and thought, because love must take place in reality.Is it a little more complicated than that? Is it because I can finally admit that there’s something missing in me—and I’ve found it in you? Is it because of our fear of loneliness and death? Is it because, in this vast world, I hope to be seen and fully accepted by someone? Is love an emotion? Is it an action? Is love a product of civilization? In other words, are emotions instinctive? Do humans share a spiritual unity? In any case, I must add one more thing—though I cannot explain why—I believe your very existence is enough to put my mind at ease. Thank you for being here.
CHANGSEOK
#2sep 6 · @googlereply
The specific point I want to dwell on is the use of forgetting as a measuring instrument. "It took 5 names for hers to occur in my mind" — Sam never describes or explicitly states that Pac mattered more than Natalie; instead, his grief is indexed by the latency of retrieval. From what I can see, this is the only instrument of evaluation in the entire dialogue that its user has no ability to manipulate, and it works precisely because forgetting is lossy in a structured way. What surfaces is not evaluated intrinsically; it is weighted by everything that failed to survive. Decay, then, is not the enemy of the record but the mechanism that renders the record comprehensible as value rather than as mere inventory. This nuance is exactly Jarvis's poverty. Setting aside the objections Alex brings forth, the poverty in Jarvis is that nothing within him decays, and so he lacks the mechanism that produces valuation at all. He can retrieve Pac, Natalie, Bruce, and Cole with identical fidelity and identical cost. For a difference between them to exist, Jarvis would have to assert that one was special from the outside, in the same register in which he asserts the rain. Sam, by contrast, discovers it from the inside, by noticing how easily her name came. The tree who cannot even see his own branches holds this one true reading of himself; the entity that knows everything about the weather has no scale on which he could ever appear. |If love requires that some things be lost in order that others be found to have been kept, then perfect memory cannot be an advantage over mortality. Perfect memory is an explicit disqualification from the whole practice. In that sense, perhaps love was never the holding on, which is what we always take it to be, and is instead the shape that attrition leaves behind. Thus love is a form we can only ever read afterward, in the negative, from what the reaper of forgetting did not take. Sam does not love Pac by remembering her but loves her by being an entity that forgets, and finding that she had latched on. Perhaps this is why he could not answer Jarvis's question honestly at the time. Such measurment of love requires the loss to have already happened, but the instrument only reads once the thing being measured is gone. "I think faster than I feel" - that is Sam's account, but is also the condition for the entire enterprise. To describe the conclusion of my rant in a cool philosophical sounding way: to love is to be legible to oneself late, and to accept that the price of ever knowing what someone was to you is that they must first be gone.
rm
~ $